Ripple’s XRP Token Receives Mixed Verdict from Federal Court

In a recent ruling by the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, Judge Analisa Torres delivered a verdict on the legal status of Ripple’s XRP token, stating that it can be treated as a security for institutional sales but not for public sales. The decision comes after a lengthy legal battle between Ripple Labs, the creators of XRP, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Let’s delve into the details of this landmark ruling.

Ripple's XRP token representing the changing landscape of securities in the cryptocurrency industry.

The Nuances of the Verdict

Judge Torres carefully examined various sales methods of the XRP token over time, applying the Howey Test to each scenario. As a result, she granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment concerning the institutional sale of XRP, deeming it a security. This means that when XRP is used for institutional sales, it falls under the jurisdiction of securities law.

However, the judge rejected the SEC’s request for summary judgment in other circumstances, including programmatic sales of XRP and sales by former and current leaders of Ripple. In these instances, Judge Torres ruled that XRP should not be considered a security when sold to the broader public.

A Double-Edged Sword

The verdict can be seen as a mixed outcome for Ripple and the XRP token. Nevertheless, the crypto community has predominantly responded positively, particularly because most investors are retail investors involved in the non-security aspect of the ruling. The value of XRP experienced a surge of 28%, reaching 60 cents, following the court’s decision.

SEC’s Crackdown on the Crypto Market

This ruling arrives at a time when the SEC is intensifying its enforcement actions against entities involved in alleged securities law violations within the cryptocurrency industry. The regulatory agency has filed lawsuits against both international and domestic players, such as Binance and Coinbase, respectively. While the SEC takes a broad approach to identifying illegal activities in the crypto market, Judge Torres’ ruling reveals that other agencies may have a narrower perspective.

Implications for Ripple and XRP

Despite not achieving a complete legal reprieve, the value of XRP has continued to rise. Investors appear to perceive the ruling as carrying less legal risk for Ripple Labs and XRP than initially feared. Furthermore, even a partial victory for XRP is seen as a positive outcome. As a result, holders of XRP are currently enjoying increased profits.

It is worth noting that the SEC’s case against Ripple and its executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen, commenced in December 2020. The agency alleged that Ripple conducted an unregistered and ongoing digital asset securities offering, raising $1.3 billion. The court’s ruling adds an additional chapter to the ongoing legal saga surrounding Ripple and its controversial XRP token.

In conclusion, Judge Torres’ nuanced ruling has classified Ripple’s XRP token as a security for institutional sales but not for public sales. The decision highlights the complexities surrounding the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies and provides valuable insights into how different sales methods can influence their legal classification. As Ripple and the SEC continue to navigate the legal landscape, the crypto community remains hopeful for further clarity and stability in the ever-evolving world of digital assets.


1. What is the significance of the recent ruling on XRP?

The ruling determines that XRP can be treated as a security for institutional sales but not for public sales. This has important implications for Ripple and the broader cryptocurrency industry.

2. Why is the crypto community reacting positively to the ruling?

Most of the crypto community, particularly retail investors, view the ruling in a positive light because it classifies XRP as a non-security when sold to the broader public.

3. How long has the SEC case against Ripple been ongoing?

The SEC case against Ripple has been in court since December 2020 when the agency sued Ripple and its executives for an alleged unregistered digital asset securities offering.

4. What does the ruling suggest about the SEC’s actions in the crypto market?

The ruling indicates that there are other regulatory agencies beyond the SEC that consider certain activities in the crypto world as illegal, although with narrower interpretations.

5. How did the market respond to the recent ruling?

Following the ruling, the value of XRP increased by 28%, indicating that investors perceived the decision as favorable and driving profits for XRP holders.

Leave a Comment